In the good company of doubters

I preached on John 20 this past Sunday, which includes the well-known story of “Doubting Thomas.”  Personally, I think Thomas has gotten a bad rap.  Two reasons…

::     O  N  E     ::

People perceive Thomas as a failure because they perceive that doubt = bad.  That’s not true.  Doubting something can lead you to investigating it and discovering its veracity (or lack thereof) for yourself.  Having doubts – even about faith – can actually end up strengthening faith.  Thomas’ time of doubt concludes with him confessing to Jesus: “My Lord and my God!” (20:28).  From this famous (or infamous) doubter comes “the greatest confession of the Lord who rose from the dead” (George R. Beasley-Murray’s commentary on John’s Gospel, p. 385).  This can be anyone’s experience, assuming you decide to actually wrestle with your doubts.  If you say you have doubts about faith but do nothing to work through your doubt, then I’d call it cynicism or flat-out disbelief, not doubt.

Because people perceive doubt = bad, I think many hear disappointment or impatience in Jesus’ words when he says to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands.  Reach out your hand and put it into my side.  Stop doubting and believe” (20:27).  I do not believe that accurately captures the tone of Jesus’ voice or the language of His posture.  Instead, I see Jesus simply doing what He always does – taking the initiative, doing what it takes to draw, to woo people to Him.  So Thomas is not a failure.  He serves as part of the picture of what Jesus can and will do to strengthen people in their faith.

Jn 20 - Art - Watanabe's Doubt of Thomas 

::     T  W  O     ::

The other reason Thomas has received a bad rap is because he is often portrayed as the only doubter in the room.  It’s only been one short week since the rest of the disciples were in the same room, “the doors locked for fear of the Jewish leaders” (20:19).  Why were they huddled together in secrecy and fear?  They had heard the report of Mary Magdalene, that she had seen the empty tomb and the living Jesus.  Why else were they huddled together in secrecy and fear except for the likely reason that they doubted Mary’s report.  They, too, wouldn’t believe the report without proof!  A week before the events concluding John 20, the room was filled with doubters.  In John 20:25, Thomas is the only one doubting now, yet he’s the one we single out and call Doubting Thomas.  The poor guy.  (Gail R. O’Day writes about this in her commentary on John’s Gospel, pp. 846, 849.)

Personally, I receive comfort in reflecting on how I am in good company when I have doubts, knowing that the very first disciples experienced the same thing – and had their doubts taken seriously and resolved.

”Doubt of Thomas” by modern Japanese artist Sadao Watanabe.

4 thoughts on “In the good company of doubters

  1. Amen Brother! I think doubt can be healthy if it drives us to the cross!


  2. Corey Geertsma says:

    Totally agree with this. Sometimes I think the abscence of doubt can display a lack of faith. When I read this story I notice 2 things:

    First, I look at the messenger. I beleve Peter was one of the disciples who gave Thomas the news of Jesus’ ressurection. The same rash Peter who jumps headlong into anything and everything…whether it’s jumping out of the boat to walk on water, or slicing of soldier’s ears in the garden of Gethsemene. Even when Jesus predicts that “all will fall away on account of me,” Peter shouts “Even if all fall away on account of you I NEVER WILL!….. What happened? Peter ends up denying Jesus 3 time before the rooster crows. (Matthew 26:33) Thomas is simply looking at the messenger and saying: “Wait a minute… I know you’re history… I’ll believe you when I see it for myself… I’m not going to take you’re word for it.”

    The second thing that struck me is the fact that I don’t believe Thomas ever actually put his fingers in the nail marks.

    Jesus offers them to him saying “Put your finger here… reach out and touch my side” but Thomas respons by saying “My Lord and my God.”

    As soon as Thomas sees Jesus’ wounds he believes. In a sense he is saying “OK now I’ve seen it, I’ve verified Peter’s story… I don’t need anymore proof, there is no need for me to touch the wounds.”

    Another reason that makes me beieve Thomas never actually touchs Jesus is Jesus’ response in the next verse, he says: “Because you have seen you have believed.” He doesn’t say “Because you have touched you have believed.”

    That’s my rant about this really cool story…wish I could’ve been there to hear the sermon!


  3. SjG says:

    Thank you, Corey, for your comments! I hadn’t thought of the “reputation” Peter might have had in Thomas’ opinion. And I doubt (ha, ha… *doubt!*) Thomas needed to touch Jesus as the text really emphasizes the seeing aspect as you point out. I’ll send you an email with the message attached. Looking forward to your return to Telkwa! =) S.


  4. […] These reflections appear in today’s edition of the Rock Valley Bee. I’ve written about Thomas before too.– […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s